Energy Aperture

Value chain · CLM-0214

In plain terms

Six different solar-power-satellite designs each claim that turning the electricity collected on the ground into grid-ready power is 90 to 99% efficient, but nobody has independently checked these numbers.

The claim as recorded

Across six compared SBSP reference designs (NASA RD1, NASA RD2, Thales Alenia Space ESA, Space Solar large-scale, Virtus Solis P1, Space Solar small-scale), the "convert and deliver" ground-side conversion efficiency - the stage from rectenna DC output through to grid-ready power - is claimed at 90%, 90%, 94%, 95%, 99% and 95% respectively.

Scope and limits

These are CLAIMED, unverified figures, not measured or independently audited results, and are a separate pipeline stage from the "rectenna collection/reception efficiency" figures on the same table (64% to 92% across the same six designs) - the two must not be conflated into a single ground-conversion number.

What it assumes

Each manufacturer's own definition of "conversion efficiency" is comparable across designs; the report itself notes definitions vary (e.g. footnote 8 on rectenna efficiency), so this comparability should not be assumed without caution.

Where it comes from

SRC-076 RAF036/2425: Feasibility of Small-Scale Space Based Solar Power Systems for Early Market...
p.12, Table 1, row "Conversion efficiency" under stage "Convert and deliver": values 90%, 90%, 94%, 95%, 99%, 95% for the six designs in column order. p.11: "Table 1 presents a comparison of these systems, based on manufacturers' claimed values (not independently verified by Frazer-Nash)." Confirmed verbatim against the PDF text layer.

Basis: Manufacturer-claimed values across six SBSP reference designs, not independently verified by the report's authors

Related records
Answers question
QST-002 not published in this release
Contradicts
CLM-0784 not published in this release

Cite this

energyaperture.com/c/clm-0214

CLM-0214, Energy Aperture, as of 2025.

Connected records

Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.

Also from SRC-076
CLM-0018The most recent UK government report calls 230 watts per square metre a limit to be reached because it lowers cost, and cites an earlier...
CLM-0019The report sets out Space Solar's plan: a small in-orbit test, then 31 megawatts in 2030, 150 megawatts in 2033, and 650 megawatts in...
CLM-0152Two UK industry planning documents, from 2022 and 2025, each state a beam-intensity design figure in the 230-245 watts-per-square-metre...
CLM-0213The study assumes that connecting a ground receiving site to the electricity grid costs about GBP 150,000 for every megawatt of power the...
CLM-0215Any UK ground receiving station that wants to connect to the electricity grid must be able to supply or absorb a type of power called...
CLM-0216The UK's fast-response grid support services need a generator to react within seconds, at any moment over a 4-hour period. A ground...
CLM-0503Under the international radio rules as revised at the 2023 world radio conference, there is no radio-frequency allocation for beaming power...
CLM-0517Every date in the plan -- the ground demo (2026), the demo mission (2027-28), 2030, 2033 and 2036 -- is a hope, not a booking, and the...
More on the source page.