Value chain · CLM-0765
In plain terms
Searching all fourteen security and defence sources for anything about insurance or liability turns up no premium, no cover limit and no liability figure for any satellite; the only real mention is one reference to the 1972 space liability treaty.
The claim as recorded
A sweep of all fourteen sources retrieved for XC04 on 2026-09-04, for the terms insur, liabilit, premium, indemnif, indemnit, underwrit and actuarial, returns 17 raw matches and no insurance premium, coverage limit, liability quantum, actuarial rate or exclusion clause for any space asset; every match resolves to one of four things: the string liabilit inside the word reliability, the word premium inside a newspaper URL, one metaphorical use of premium about weapons magazines, or two citations of the 1972 UN Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, which ESA names as part of the reason internationally accepted debris mitigation measures were needed, so the total substantive insurance and liability content across the fourteen sources is that single treaty reference.
Scope and limits
This measures vocabulary over extracted text, not substance, and per METHOD's own O1 lesson the measurement is named rather than just the number: these are regular-expression occurrence counts over pdftotext output, not line counts and not a claim about the insurance literature. It says only that these fourteen sources contain no such figure. It does NOT show that no space-insurance data exists - a space insurance market plainly does - and it may not be cited as evidence that a GEO asset is uninsurable or that its premium is unknown to anyone. These fourteen sources were retrieved for counterspace threat, debris and command-link security, so the absence is partly explained by what they were selected for; the finding is that the layer's own evidence base cannot answer the question, not that the question is unanswerable.
What it assumes
That the PDF text layers are complete for prose. SRC-226's figure pages are also readable (PyMuPDF extracts their labels directly; pdftotext returns them offset by 29 character codes, which decode to the same text). Re-run on 2026-09-25 over all 151 SRC-226 pages from pdftotext with the figure labels decoded, the sweep pattern returns the same 3 matches (pp.12, 16, 149), so SRC-226's figures hold no insurance or liability term.
Where it comes from
This is the project's own working, shown in full:
Per-source raw match counts, followed by what they were. SRC-223 Secure World Foundation, 10 matches: counterinsurgency and reliability strings, two premium occurrences inside Bloomberg and Haaretz URLs, and one metaphorical "There will be a high premium for deep magazines". SRC-225 US DIA, 2 matches: both reliability. SRC-226 ESA, 3 matches: one reliability plus two references to the Liability Convention, the substantive one verbatim at printed p.12: "The threat of space debris to the future of spaceflight combined with the nearly universal adoption of the Liability Convention [7] created the need for a set of internationally accepted space debris mitigation measures." SRC-229 NASA ODQN, 1 match: reliability. SRC-235 arXiv, 1 match: reliability. SRC-224, SRC-227, SRC-228, SRC-232, SRC-233, SRC-234 and SRC-236: zero matches. SRC-230 and SRC-231 are saved web pages, were read in full, and contain no insurance or liability content. Sweep pattern: insur|liabilit|premium|indemnif|indemnit|underwrit|actuarial, case-insensitive, over pdftotext output.
Basis: occurrence counts from a case-insensitive regular-expression sweep of extracted PDF text
Related records
- Answers question
- QST-011 not published in this release
Cite this
energyaperture.com/c/clm-0765
CLM-0765, Energy Aperture, as of 2026-09-04.
Connected records
Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.
- Also from SRC-223
- CLM-0741A 2026 independent assessment says China is unlikely to have a working weapon that could shoot down a satellite as high as geostationary...CLM-0742A 2026 assessment lists thirteen Chinese anti-satellite tests since 2005; only one is recorded as going far above low orbit, to about...CLM-0743Two separate expert bodies looked at the same 2013 Chinese launch and disagreed about what it was: one calls it probably a rocket test, the...CLM-0744The higher a satellite orbits, the longer the warning it gets: minutes in low orbit, but several hours at geostationary altitude, and the...CLM-0745The 2026 assessment says that if China physically destroyed a satellite, it would create long-lasting debris that would also endanger its...
- Also from SRC-230
- CLM-0757In its own report on the February 2022 attack, Viasat says the attacker got in through a misconfigured VPN device, reached the network...CLM-0758Viasat's own report, about five weeks after the attack, says it had found no evidence that the satellite itself or its main ground stations...
- Also from SRC-231
- CLM-0759The UK's national cyber security agency said in May 2022 that Russia was almost certainly behind the attack on Viasat, that it started...