Value chain · CLM-0242
In plain terms
Working the power output out from scratch, using only the physics of sunlight and the efficiency losses NASA itself lists, gives the same answer NASA published.
The claim as recorded
Recomputing delivered power from panel area, the solar constant (1367.5 W/m^2), and the report's own seven-stage conversion-efficiency chain (0.35 x 0.90 x 0.70 x 0.90 x 0.98 x 0.95 x 0.78 x 0.90 = 0.1297) reproduces NASA OTPS's stated "power delivered" of 2028.79 MW (RD1) and 2021.95 MW (RD2) to 5 significant figures, using only physics, with no cost figure as an input.
Scope and limits
Confirms internal arithmetic consistency of the design description, not that the efficiency figures themselves are achievable or correctly sourced from Rodenbeck et al.
What it assumes
Report's own efficiency figures (attributed to Rodenbeck et al.) are taken as given, not independently re-derived from device physics.
Where it comes from
This is the project's own working, shown in full:
Trace, Section 3: RD1 incident 15,689.3 MW x eff.chain 0.12970 x CF 0.997 = 2,028.79 MW; RD2 incident 25,982.5 MW x eff.chain 0.12970 x CF 0.60 = 2,021.95 MW.
Basis: physical constants and report-stated design parameters; no currency
Related records
- Answers question
- QST-038 not published in this release
Cite this
energyaperture.com/c/clm-0242
CLM-0242, Energy Aperture, as of 2026-09.
Connected records
Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.
- Also from SRC-012
- CLM-0006None of the five main studies mentions the international radio-frequency exposure limits, or any safety standard, or a restricted area...CLM-0123NASA's own 2024 study puts space solar power at 12 to 80 times the cost it expects in 2050 from power stations on the ground, a set it...CLM-0124NASA also found that if several things improve at once, rather than just one, space solar power does become cost competitive.CLM-0125On carbon, NASA found space solar power within the range of five renewable ways of making power on the ground (wind, solar, solar thermal...CLM-0144A NASA study found that launching everything into space is by far the biggest cost of a space solar power system, and that most of those...CLM-0192The full list of assumptions behind the headline result of NASA's 2024 study, that space solar power would cost far more than ground...CLM-0193To get to a competitive cost, NASA's own 2024 analysis needs launch costs to halve, solar cells to get much more efficient, satellites to...CLM-0240A from-scratch cost model of the "Innovative Heliostat Swarm" design gets almost the same electricity cost as NASA's own study: about 62...More on the source page.