Energy Aperture

Value chain · CLM-0899

In plain terms

The patent never says the steering signal is protected in any way. There is a difference between scrambling that signal so nobody can read it and signing it so the satellite can tell a fake from the real thing. Only the second would stop someone aiming the beam. The patent has neither.

The claim as recorded

GB2563574 contains no encryption, authentication, security-coding, spread-spectrum or anti-spoofing language of any kind. The pilot appears only as "a low power pilot beam" whose spherical wavefront is sampled, and nothing in the document conditions beam formation on the pilot being genuine. An ENCRYPTED pilot, whose content is concealed, and a CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY AUTHENTICATED pilot, which the satellite can verify and refuse if forged, are different mechanisms; only the second is a safety interlock, and neither is present in this document.

Evidence behind this: A UK patent application as published (GB 2563574 A, filed 5 June 2017, published 26 December 2018), read directly. The patent was granted as GB 2563574 B, published 4 August 2021, and its claims were read too. T3 because it is a published document with a named applicant and a searched disclosure (the Section 17 search report is bound in), and not T2 because a patent document teaches an invention rather than reporting a result.

Scope and limits

This is an absence in ONE document, a UK patent application filed in 2017 and published in 2018. The patent was later granted, and the granted text was published in 2021. Its 50 claims were read and hold no such language either. Its description was searched only in a machine-read copy of the page images, which holds none of these words (no form of encrypt, authenticate, cipher, crypto, spoof, codeword, secure or jam, and no "spread spectrum", on any of its 42 pages, while "pilot beam" is found 7 times on 6 pages); machine reading can miss a word, so that part of the search is weaker. It is not evidence that no authentication is stated anywhere, and it is not evidence about what Space Solar's current design does. Later filings, company material and the CASSIE papers were not covered by this reading. A patent application is a poor place to look for a security control in any case: security measures are routinely omitted from patents because disclosing them is against the applicant's interest and they rarely contribute to patentability. An absence here is weak evidence of absence in the design. The notes count of "encoding" is understated: the stem "encod" occurs twelve times on seven pages (PDF 1, 19, 24, 33, 34, 38 and 41), in the description and on the front page as well as at claims 23 and 43, all communications modulation and none security (VER-1344 CONFIRMED 2026-09-19). A coded pilot was in the US reference design, as NASA's 1981 RP-1076 records: RP-1076 (SRC-107), printed p.63 (PDF p.92), read for CLM-0160 on 2026-09-19, states that the existing baseline phase control system includes "a method of coding each SPS pilot signal" against "an intentional dephasing attempt or an attempt to redirect (rob) power" and describes "a coded (secure) pilot signal and ground sensors for additional safing"; the absence found here is in this patent application, not in the literature. RP-1076 also gives the preliminary design of the code developed by then: a split-phase, direct-sequence pseudonoise code, modulo-2 added to optional command data, that biphase-modulates the 2450 MHz pilot carrier (printed p.69, PDF p.98), with a 12-stage maximal-length shift-register sequence of period 4095 recommended as the spread-spectrum code (printed p.79, PDF p.108). The review panel report of a January 1980 workshop, bound into RP-1076 as an appendix, found that "not enough attention has been paid to the problem of security and antijamming" and asked for "State-of-the-art cryptography" from the outset (printed p.238, PDF p.267). None of these pages describes a check by which the satellite could tell a forged pilot from a real one.

What it assumes

No assumptions are recorded against this claim.

Where it comes from

SRC-088 GB2563574A: A phased array antenna and apparatus incorporating the same (UK patent application,...
SRC-795 GB2563574B: A phased array antenna and apparatus incorporating the same (UK patent as granted;...
Established by reading the complete document. Negative assertion, scope stated exactly: description internal p1-22, all 51 claims, and the search report were read in full. The front page and drawing sheets, PDF p1-12, were not read when this was written; they were swept at verification on 2026-09-13 and the finding survives across all 44 pages. An abstract cannot introduce subject matter absent from the description, so this does not weaken the finding, but the boundary of what was read is recorded rather than implied.
Related records
Answers question
QST-013 not published in this release

Cite this

energyaperture.com/c/clm-0899

CLM-0899, Energy Aperture, as of 2017-06-05.

Connected records

Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.

Also from SRC-088
CLM-0896The patent describes measuring the incoming steering signal at scattered sensors, not at every antenna, and working out the values in...
CLM-0897The satellite aims its beam by listening for a low-power signal sent up from the receiving station, measuring the shape of that arriving...
CLM-0900The satellite can point its beam far further than there is Earth to point at, so moving power from one receiving station to another is not...
CLM-0903The shared clock tells every sensor to take its reading at the same moment. How precise that clock must be depends on how fast the thing...
CLM-0905Sharing a clock is not the same as being told what to do. The clock and the carrier tell the antennas nothing about where to send the power...
CLM-0913When the satellite corrects its own bending by listening to the ground signal, what is left over is not how far the antennas moved. It is...
CLM-0942Three documents held here give three different sizes for the same satellite's transmitting antenna. The patent says 1 to 1.5 km across and...
CLM-1176Each transmitting element on the satellite is a small cluster of three short rod antennas standing a quarter of a wavelength apart, all...
More on the source page.
Also from SRC-795
CLM-0896The patent describes measuring the incoming steering signal at scattered sensors, not at every antenna, and working out the values in...
CLM-0897The satellite aims its beam by listening for a low-power signal sent up from the receiving station, measuring the shape of that arriving...
CLM-0900The satellite can point its beam far further than there is Earth to point at, so moving power from one receiving station to another is not...
CLM-0905Sharing a clock is not the same as being told what to do. The clock and the carrier tell the antennas nothing about where to send the power...
CLM-1485The patent behind the CASSIOPeiA design, both the 2018 application and the granted patent published in 2021, mentions 230 watts per square...