Value chain · CLM-0128
In plain terms
A 2013 review gives three references for the 1 kilowatt per square metre figure: two Japanese papers from 1995 and 1996, and a 1981 paper by Perkins and Goldman.
The claim as recorded
The three references a 2013 Proceedings of the IEEE review gives for its claim that ionospheric effects are not critical at around 1 kilowatt per square metre at 5.8 GHz are a 1995 Japanese numerical simulation paper, a 1996 Japanese numerical self-focusing paper, and Perkins and Goldman 1981.
Scope and limits
References 22 and 23 were NOT obtained. Both are closed Wiley content and four independent services confirm no open copy exists anywhere. So the substance of the 1 kilowatt per square metre claim is still unread and CLM-0112's tension with the 425 and 189 watts per square metre threshold estimates is unresolved.
What it assumes
No assumptions are recorded against this claim.
Where it comes from
page 1447, verified against a 300 dpi render of the reference-list page with no discrepancy against the text layer. Reference 22 is Matsumoto, Hashino, Yashiro, Shinohara and Ohmura 1995; reference 23 is Shinohara, Matsumoto and Shklyar 1996; reference 24 is Perkins and Goldman 1981.
Related records
- Answers question
- QST-001 not published in this release
Cite this
energyaperture.com/c/clm-0128
CLM-0128, Energy Aperture, as of 2013.
Connected records
Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.
- Also from SRC-127
- CLM-0111An authoritative 2013 review says the 230 watt per square metre figure was chosen early in the design as a cautious maximum. It does not...CLM-0112The same review says modern work finds about 1 kilowatt per square metre acceptable at 5.8 gigahertz, more than four times the older...CLM-0113As of 2013 the experiment needed to check these predictions had still not been done.CLM-0133A 2013 review paper says calculations suggest a stronger microwave beam than the usual safety limit would still be fine at a higher...CLM-1467 (low confidence)Keeping people out of the area where the beam is strong is a plausible way for a strong beam to meet the 2020 international limit for...