SRC-500
Preliminary Environmental Assessment for the Satellite Power System (SPS), Volume 1, Executive Summary; DOE/ER-0021/1 (Vol. 1 of 2); October 1978
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Satellite Power System Project Office, with named contributors from Argonne National Laboratory, U.S. EPA and Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories (S.L. Halverson, D.M. Rote, J.L. Lee, K.L. Brubaker, R.R. Cirillo, S.W. Ballou, S.D. Parris, D.F. Cahill, J. Allis, K. Davis, C.M. Rush, E. Morrison, W. Grant, M. White) ·1978 · T3 government or agency report · XC02XC03
Commissioned by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Satellite Power System Project Office; no contract number printed. Who paid for a study is recorded because it bears on how its conclusions should be read, not because it makes them wrong.
Identifiers: DOE/ER-0021/1 the identifier this document is registered under
Published claims resting on this source
- CLM-1165 In 1978 the government said plainly what it did not know about a space power station's effects: almost nothing about long, low-level microwave exposure of people, almost nothing about birds in the beam and nothing about whole ecosystems, and no numbers yet for anything else; it gave itself two years to find out.
- CLM-1166 An early tally of ordinary industrial harm from building the system: about twenty-five million lost working days from injuries over thirty years, more than half of them in mining the materials, and a materials bill that would take a large slice of a year's national output of mercury, argon, hydrogen and oxygen.
- CLM-1167 For the launches the 1978 assessment could only line up the rulebook - allowed minutes of rocket exhaust gases for the public, the EPA's day and night noise levels, the blast reach of a launcher twice as explosive as a Saturn V - and note that several launches a day would probably break the noise rule.
- CLM-1168 In 1978 the receiving station was expected to warm its surroundings about as much as a suburb does, unless the beam went astray; one Skylab launch had already punched a 2,000 km hole in the ionosphere for hours, and only preliminary calculations existed for what daily launches would do; water dumped above 40 km was the open climate question.
Cite this
energyaperture.com/s/src-500
SRC-500 , recorded 2026-09-17.