Value chain · CLM-0840
In plain terms
This 2022 ESA-commissioned study gave a total tonnage of greenhouse gas for launching a satellite but never converted it into emissions per unit of electricity, and apart from one sentence giving nitrogen oxides a carbon-dioxide-equivalent factor it did not assess the high-altitude effects of rocket exhaust.
The claim as recorded
SRC-207 contains no lifecycle carbon intensity figure per kWh or per MWh for SBSP, neither its own nor quoted from another study, and contains no occurrence of "life cycle" or "LCA", no treatment of black carbon, no treatment of aluminium oxide, no treatment of ozone or ozone depletion, and no occurrence of "stratospher-", its only upper-atmosphere reference being the NOx global-warming-potential sentence carried at CLM-0839.
Scope and limits
This is a scoped absence, not a universal one. It establishes what this document does not contain, using the named search terms over the named page ranges. It does not establish that ESA holds no such assessment elsewhere. The companion technical notes TN 01, TN 02, TN 03 and TN 05 (SRC-204, SRC-205, SRC-206, SRC-208) were searched in their text layers for the same terms: none gives a life-cycle assessment or a carbon intensity per kWh or MWh, and none mentions ozone or the stratosphere; TN 03 p.23, the source of this document's launch derivation, lists carbon soot among the exhaust products of solid boosters and kerosene engines, and alumina among those of solid boosters, without assessing them. The document does print the inputs for an intensity: a total of 2.6 million tons of CO2 from the launches to deploy one SPS Alpha (p.73), an annual output of c.15.7 TWh for one 2 GW system (p.75), and a 30-year economic life used in its comparison (p.73). Our arithmetic from these, 2.6E+12 g over 15.7 TWh x 30 years (4.71E+11 kWh), gives about 5.5 gCO2e/kWh for launch emissions of the space segment only, excluding manufacture and the ground segment. The document does not print this figure, and it must not be attributed to the document. The document also gives 15.8 TWh a year, allowing for equinox and maintenance downtime (p.43), and c.17 TWh (p.70, p.72); on 17 TWh the same arithmetic gives about 5.1 gCO2e/kWh, which the document does not print either.
What it assumes
No assumptions are recorded against this claim.
Where it comes from
Established by full-text extraction of the entire document searched case-insensitively for each term, supplemented by reading pages 1-6, 41-45 and 65-76 as images to cover any content present only in figures (the document has 76 pages). The single text hit for "LCA", on p.36, is inside the word "volcanic". Terms searched: "life cycle", "lifecycle", "LCA", "gCO2", "CO2e/kWh", "MWh", "black carbon", "alumina", "aluminium oxide", "ozone", "stratospher".
Related records
- Answers question
- QST-008 not published in this release
Cite this
energyaperture.com/c/clm-0840
CLM-0840, Energy Aperture, as of 2022.
Connected records
Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.
- Also from SRC-207
- CLM-0710The second European study, which had never been obtained here, is now in the archive. It puts the cost of a two-gigawatt first system at...CLM-0839A 2022 European consultancy study for ESA calculated that launching one space solar power satellite of the SPS-Alpha type would release...CLM-0841This 2022 study was written by two European firms under contract to the European Space Agency, and it cites none of the earlier life-cycle...