SRC-796
The Costs of Decarbonisation: System Costs with High Shares of Nuclear and Renewables (NEA No. 7299)
Commissioned by NEA. Who paid for a study is recorded because it bears on how its conclusions should be read, not because it makes them wrong.
NEA No. 7299 the identifier this document is registered under
Published claims resting on this source
- CLM-1487 In Britain, the amount of fast back-up power kept ready depends mainly on the biggest single block of power that could be lost at once; the rules do not set it by fuel. So a space solar station would need about the same fast back-up as a gas power station whose biggest single loss is the same size. A 2 GW space plant would be a bigger single loss than the 1,800 MW Britain now plans for, if one fault could take all of it. A satellite in geostationary orbit also passes through the Earth's shadow each night for about six weeks around each spring and autumn equinox, for up to about 70 minutes. Those times can be predicted exactly, and other power stations would have to cover them.
Cite this
energyaperture.com/s/src-796
SRC-796 , recorded 2026-10-21.