SRC-692

Comments and Suggestions Regarding the ANSI C-95.4 Subcommittee Report on Research Needs for Radiofrequency and Microwave Standards Setting (typescript critique, 25 numbered pages)

Unsigned; no issuing body printed (a handwritten note on p.1 suggests authors; not printed and not used) ·undated (not printed; the report it critiques is not dated on these pages) · T3 government or agency report · VC06 XC01

Commissioned by UNKNOWN. Who paid for a study is recorded because it bears on how its conclusions should be read, not because it makes them wrong.

https://zoryglaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COMMENTS-AND-SUGGESTIONS-REGARDING-THE-ANSI-C-95-SUBCOMMITTEE-REPORT-ON-RESEARCH-NEEDS-FOR-RADIOFREQUENCY-AND-MICROWAVE-STANDARDS-SETTINGS.pdf the identifier this document is registered under

Published claims resting on this source

CLM-1336 (low confidence) An old reviewer's note says the US microwave limit came mainly from a heat-balance calculation for an average man, after an earlier limit ten times higher, and not from laboratory evidence of harm.

Cite this

energyaperture.com/s/src-692

SRC-692 , recorded 2026-10-02.