CALC-094
Station keeping against sunlight, inverted from the 1978 design's own propellant budget
What this is
This is the project's own arithmetic, published in full so it can be checked rather than taken on trust. It is not a source. Every input it uses is cited to a record, and the conclusion it reaches only carries as far as those inputs do.
Feeds CLM-0885. Answers QST-004. Basis: dimensionless mass fraction, and m/s of delta-v.
Why it was needed. VC04's depth target is L2, which asks for the governing parametric relationship with its inputs and their ranges. Station-keeping propellant over a multi-decade life is that relationship, and CLM-0330 states that solar radiation pressure counteraction is 8.12 of the 9.98 percentage points - 81 per cent of the whole budget. Inverting the published mass fraction gives the delta-v it implies, which is a figure no source states and which can be compared directly against a conventional satellite.
Relationship.
m_p/m_0 = 1 - exp(-(dv_annual x T) / (Isp x g0)) g0 = 9.80665 m/s2Inputs.
| Quantity | Value | Source | Stated or assumed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific impulse, argon ion ACS | 13,000 s | CLM-0332 | STATED, 1978 ACS baseline |
| Design life | 30 years | CLM-0330 | STATED |
| Propellant mass fraction, total | 9.98 per cent | CLM-0330 | STATED |
| Propellant mass fraction, SRP term | 8.12 points of that 9.98 | CLM-0330 | STATED |
| Comparator, conventional GEO satellite | about 50 m/s/yr, entire budget | CLM-0441 | STATED |
| Isp range across other held EP | 1,400-4,200 s (CLM-0672); 3,000 s assumed (CLM-0682) | CLM-0672, CLM-0682 | STATED, for range only - NOT used in the inversion |
| That the 13,000 s ACS Isp applies to the propellant this budget covers | - | - | ASSUMED. The 1978 design uses one ACS for both and does not state it separately |
Working.
dv = -Isp x g0 x ln(1 - m_p/m_0), then divided by T = 30 years
total 9.98 pct -> 13,403.7 m/s over 30 yr -> 446.8 m/s/yr
SRP 8.12 pct -> 10,796.4 m/s over 30 yr -> 359.9 m/s/yr
non-SRP 1.86 pct -> 2,393.6 m/s over 30 yr -> 79.8 m/s/yrConvention, stated because the two routes disagree by 8.9 per cent. The non-SRP figure is computed from its own stated mass fraction, 1.86 points of m_0, and NOT by subtracting the SRP delta-v from the total. Subtracting gives 2,607.3 m/s, 86.9 m/s/yr, because MASS FRACTIONS REFERENCED TO A COMMON INITIAL MASS DO NOT SUBTRACT UNDER THE ROCKET EQUATION - each fraction is taken against the same m_0, while successive burns are not. The mass-fraction route is the correct one here because CLM-0330 states 8.12 and 9.98 against the same spacecraft mass. THIS 8.9 PER CENT IS NOT THE CROSS-CHECK BELOW AND MUST NOT BE READ AS IT - the two numbers are close in size and unrelated in meaning.
Cross-check, from a different table of the same report. CLM-0331 gives 93,000 kg/yr of propellant. Over 30 years that is 2,790,000 kg against a 30.47e6 kg dry mass, or 9.16 per cent, against CLM-0330's 9.98 per cent. Agreement within 9 per cent, from cells that were not used above.
Result. The SRP term alone requires 360 m/s/yr, 7.2 times the approximately 50 m/s/yr that is a conventional geostationary satellite's ENTIRE station-keeping budget. The residual non-SRP term, 80 m/s/yr, lands on the same order as that conventional figure, which is the check passing rather than a separate finding.
What this does not establish. Solar-radiation-pressure delta-v scales with area-to-mass ratio, and the register holds an SRP propellant figure for exactly one design. It does not transfer.
Cite this
energyaperture.com/calc/calc-094
CALC-094. The working above, not a source document.