Energy Aperture

Value chain · CLM-0824

In plain terms

This is a 2002 discussion paper that says it summarises two 1998 discussion papers by an overlapping group of authors, does not point to any later peer-reviewed version of itself, and cites none of the later UK-led work, which it predates, that redid the analysis by a different method, counting other greenhouse gases as well as carbon dioxide, and got a much higher figure.

The claim as recorded

This document is KEO discussion paper G-145 of January 2002, whose title-page footnote states that it summarises its references [20] and [21], two earlier KEO discussion papers dated 1998a and 1998b by an overlapping author group, with a related 1998c article in the Business Journal of PAPAIOS; no later peer-reviewed version of this specific paper is named anywhere in it, and its full 22-item reference list contains no citation of any Strathclyde-authored process-based life-cycle assessment.

Scope and limits

The absence of a Strathclyde-authored citation was checked against this document's own 22-item reference list, title page and abstract only. It CANNOT establish informal awareness, nor whether any later publication by this group engaged with that work, and it is weak evidence of independence in one direction only, since this 2002 document predates the process-based SBSP life-cycle work it is compared with: SRC-212 (2020, PDF p.4) says the 2000 version of this study was the only earlier environmental life-cycle assessment of the technology. Other versions of the study lie outside this document: a 2020 conference paper's reference list gives a 2000 conference paper by the same five authors (13th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata) and a 2005 journal paper by an overlapping author group (IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 35(3)); neither is held.

What it assumes

No assumptions are recorded against this claim.

Where it comes from

SRC-216 CO2 Emission from Solar Power Satellite. KEO discussion paper G-145, Keio Economic Observatory,...
SRC-212 A process-based life cycle sustainability assessment of the space-based solar power concept....
Title-page footnote, printed p.1 (PDF p.4): "This paper summarizes" references [20] and [21]. References, printed p.13 (PDF p.16), read in full: 22 items dated 1970 to 1998. [20] (1998a): "CO2 Emission of Solar Power Satellite" (in Japanese), "KEO DISCUSSION PAPER , No.2". [21] (1998b): a simulations paper, "KEO DISCUSSION PAPER , No.14". [22] (1998c): an article in the "Business Journal of PAPAIOS, Vol.8, No.2". Each of [20] to [22] has four authors, three of whom are on this paper's five-author byline.
Related records
Answers question
QST-008 not published in this release
Contradicts
CLM-0182 When two different research teams assessed the exact same 1978 space solar power design, the...

Cite this

energyaperture.com/c/clm-0824

CLM-0824, Energy Aperture, as of 2002.

Connected records

Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.

Also from SRC-212
CLM-0316In 2009 three researchers guessed that, once the energy to deliver and use it is counted, an oil-based fuel must return at least about 3...
CLM-0810A 2020 modelling study estimated that, across its whole operating life from 2040 to 2100, the 1978 NASA/DOE space solar power design would...
CLM-0811In a 2020 modelling study of the 1978 NASA/DOE space solar power design, the carbon per kilowatt-hour fell the longer the satellites were...
CLM-0812A 2020 modelling study of the 1978 NASA/DOE design estimated that its ozone-depleting emissions, almost all from burning rocket fuel at...
CLM-0813The paper's detailed component-by-component calculation gives a carbon figure five to six times higher than an older top-down calculation...
CLM-0814A 2020 conference paper's own cost model put the whole 60-satellite programme of the 1978 US reference design at about 3.86 trillion US...
CLM-0815The 2020 study of the 1978 NASA/DOE design did not count any warming from the microwave beams themselves, saying that is too hard to...
CLM-0816In their 2020 study of the 1978 NASA/DOE design, the authors list their own weak points: only whole-system detail rather than part-by-part...
More on the source page.
Also from SRC-216
CLM-0818A 2002 Japanese input-output study estimates that building and launching a 1978-design fleet of 60 solar power satellites would release...
CLM-0819A 2002 Japanese input-output study estimates that if each new satellite were built with electricity from those already working, a fleet of...
CLM-0820For comparison in the same units, a 2002 Japanese study of space solar power reports about 22 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour for...
CLM-0821In a 2002 Japanese study of the 1978 US design, a table splits the estimated carbon dioxide from building and launching the system by part...
CLM-0822In a 2002 Japanese study of the 1978 US design, building the launch rockets and the vehicles that move cargo and crews between orbits...
CLM-0823A 2002 Japanese study's carbon dioxide figures for space solar power come from Japan's 1990 economic input-output tables, with 405 industry...
CLM-1462 (low confidence)A 2020 paper's finding that its detailed method gave five to six times the carbon of an earlier, simpler study of the same 1978 design...
Contradicted by
CLM-0182When two different research teams assessed the exact same 1978 space solar power design, the older accounting method (which spreads...