Value chain · CLM-0504
In plain terms
None of the main CASSIOPeiA-related documents in the register mentions any named safety or exposure standard, or describes any restricted area around the receiving site, anywhere in nearly 300 pages.
The claim as recorded
Across five primary documents in the register (two UK Frazer-Nash studies and one executive summary, the 2019 CASSIOPeiA paper and NASA OTPS 2024) (288 pages total: SRC-012, SRC-022, SRC-023, SRC-024, SRC-026), a full-text search finds zero occurrences of ICNIRP, IEEE C95, "exposure limit", "exposure guideline", "safety standard", "regulatory limit", "non-ionising", "exclusion zone", "keep-out", "restricted area" or "controlled area"; no exclusion-zone or SAR-compliance design of any kind is proposed anywhere in this material.
Scope and limits
Absence-of-evidence finding; a later or unread document could contain this design work. The register is not exhaustive of everything Space Solar has published.
What it assumes
No assumptions are recorded against this claim.
Where it comes from
CLM-0006 support: "Full text extracted with PyMuPDF and searched case-insensitively across every page. Counts were zero for every term listed."
Related records
- Answers question
- QST-001 not published in this release
Cite this
energyaperture.com/c/clm-0504
CLM-0504, Energy Aperture, as of 2019.
Connected records
Other published records linked to this one. A list, not a judgement.
- Also from SRC-026
- CLM-0004The author of the 2019 CASSIOPeiA paper states the beam's strongest point is about 230 watts per square metre, and says that figure was...CLM-0006None of the five main studies mentions the international radio-frequency exposure limits, or any safety standard, or a restricted area...CLM-0013The paper that modern UK studies rely on for the beam figure calls anything below 1 kilowatt per square metre safe, with 230 watts per...CLM-0336Different design studies over four decades have each simply assumed a different working lifetime for a solar power satellite, from about 15...CLM-0339A 2019 paper said solar power satellites are often assumed to need visits in orbit for repairs and refuelling, but that no system yet...CLM-0441A normal geostationary satellite needs a small, regular fuel-based nudge every year to stay in place. One 2019 design proposes cutting most...CLM-0660The 2019 CASSIOPeiA paper does not discuss electric propulsion for getting the satellite to its orbit. It only prices delivery using...CLM-1175The design would control its orientation without fuel. Small mirror panels near its front carry a coating whose reflection can be changed...More on the source page.